Normality and homogeneity of variances were checked by means of Levene’s and Shapiro–Wilk tests, respectively. Potential food sources can be grouped according to ecological, archaeological and isotopic relevance. Food resources were categorized into five food groups: terrestrial herbivores (i.e., deer, wild boar, hare), berjack), game birds (i.e., pheasants, bustard, wild goose, swan), Cstep 3 (i.e., rice, wheat, soybean), and Ccuatro (foxtail millet, broomcorn millet, barnyard millet) plants. In this study, we were not able to separate the livestock (horse, dog, cattle, pig) from the game birds due to their isotopic similarity. Thus, we combined the livestock with the game birds according to isotopic relevance. Isotopic data of three food wing kuponları groups (game birds, marine animals, terrestrial herbivores) derived from the Imdang burials and other archaeological sites in South Korea (Nukdo, Tongsamdong, Ando, Dongnae) 52,53,54,59 and two plant groups from archaeological and modern isotopic data in South Korea and East Asia were used 64,65,66,67,68 . We used univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate possible differences in isotopic values among the five food groups (C3 plant, e birds, terrestrial herbivores, C4 plant). A post hoc Turkey’ multiple test was used to evaluate differences between each food group and the Imdang humans. A MixSIAR model was used to estimate the proportional contribution of each food group to each individual, providing an estimate of the variability in the estimated proportion 35 . We incorporated the ? 13 C and ? 15 N values of the humans, the five food groups as well as trophic discrimination factors (C3 plant: ? 13 C = 5.2‰ and ? 15 N = 3.8‰; C4 plant: ? 13 C = 4.5‰ and ? 15 N = 3.8‰; animal: ? 13 C = 1‰ and ? 15 N = 3.8‰) to predict accurately the dietary proportions 33,34,69 . The level of significance was set at P ? 0.05. All statistical tests were performed using an R statistical program.
Recommendations
Lee, H. J. Progression and you can conversion process of the old regional polity in the Gyeongsan city. J. Yeungnam Archaeol. 34, 5–34 (2004).
Nelson, S. Yards. Neu, J. For the Guide regarding East and you can Southeast Far eastern Archaeology (eds. Habu, J., Lape, P. V. Olsen, J. W.) 603–617 (Springer, New york, 2017).
Kang, B. W. An examination from broadening warfare throughout the Samguk Sagi from the archaeological stays in Yeungnam, Southern area Korea. J. Eastern Far-eastern Archaeol. dos, 139–197 (2000).
Pearson correlations were utilized to own examining the presence of extreme matchmaking one of the felt variables
Conte, Meters. Kim, J. A benefit out-of individual compromise: The practice of sunjang inside the a historical county away from Korea. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 49, 14–30 (2016).
Jang, Y. S. Business and change of your own old polity of Gyeongsan area researched from Imdang site. J. Korean Field Archaeol. 3, 44–85 (2007).
Chang, Y. C. A survey with the integration and you can importance of use excavated out-of old tombs on Yimdang website in Gyeongsan. Inmum Nonchong 43, 25–46 (2017).
Choi, B. We. A study on the form of chief burial chamber and accessory burial chamber from inside the Imdang, Gyeongsan. Sogang J. Very early Korean Record twenty-two, 349–378 (2016).
Jang, Y. S. The newest reorganization out of settlement place following construction out of Imdang earthen wall surface fortress. J. Korean Archaeol. Soc. 101, 90–123 (2016).
Kim, Y. S. Chronology from ancient burials in line with the pottery off Daegu, Gyeongsan urban area. J. Korean Archaeol. Soc. thirty five, 79–151 (1996).
Kim, D. W. A survey towards features out of tucked individual while the society away from sacrificial burial from ancient tombs in the Imdang. Sogang J. Early Korean Background 20, 147–183 (2015).